A Nationwide Crisis
Financing remains to be the 800-pound gorilla in the room for healthcare providers and patients alike. While talking about money was once considered a taboo topic for many Americans, the reality is that not talking about it is costing patients money…and their health.
The 2024 Survey of Household Economics and Decision-making (SHED) published last spring revealed that 28% of Americans went without some form of medical care in 2024 because they could not afford it. Over a 12-month period:
- 19% bypassed going to the dentist
- 16% forwent seeing a doctor or specialist
- 11% skipped prescription medications
- 11% passed on follow-up care
- 9% declined mental health or counseling
These stats paint a grim reality—patient pay, the share of medical costs that patients have to pay themselves, is harder than ever. Several factors are to blame, including:
- Deductibles and patient responsibility is at an all-time high
- Providers are collecting more money post-visit
- Financing is available at many provider locations, but the details are murky at best
What the industry desperately needs is a fresh approach to patient financing, starting with programs that put the patients back in the driver’s seat. Many healthcare organizations have rolled out financing options to help their populations manage complex medical bills, but financing alone doesn’t solve the problem.
The most effective patient financing programs are built on three foundational principles: coordination, transparency and accountability.
Principle #1: Coordination—We’re All in This Together
There is no other industry in the world where you can receive a product or service without knowing the upfront costs—except healthcare. While steps have been taken to bolster transparency for self pay patients and the uninsured, including provisions under the No Surprises Act of 2022, many are still in the dark about their financial options.
The first principle to counteract this dilemma is coordination. Financing programs are only good if people know about them. Unfortunately, it’s not unusual for these programs to be activated too late in the process. Patients need to be notified at registration what their estimated costs will be and what the payment options look like. It can’t stop there though…once the finance program is in place, providers have a responsibility to work in lockstep with the patient to make sure they are on track.
A 2025 Cedar survey of 4,150 American adults found that 53% of at-risk patients don’t reach out when bills are confusing. Additionally, 39% of high-capacity patients don’t either. When bills are unclear, it makes sense that patients don’t want to mess with long call wait times and re-explaining their situations on the rare occasion that they do talk to a live agent for billing support.
For coordination to work, information has to flow between patients, providers, insurance and revenue cycle teams. Common mistakes that muddy the waters are standard registration procedures such as: eligibility, insurance verification, pre-service estimates (despite legislation that requires it) and early identification of patients in need of payment plans. When communications break down amongst any of these parties, financing becomes reactive instead of support. Patients suffer the consequences.
Principle #2: Transparency—Say It Now, Reduce Friction Later
Patient struggles begin when communication becomes unclear or worse, nonexistent. How you communicate is equally imperative as what you’re communicating. Sure, you want the terms of your patient financing program to be straightforward and you also want enrollment to be easy. But at the end of the day you’ve got to meet patients where they are.
Phone lines are often the biggest barrier to successful care delivery, and as previously mentioned put a great source of strain on not only the patients dialing in but the overworked staff trying to field all of the calls. Having other options for communicating with patients—be it email, text and good old fashioned snail mail—allows providers to engage with a diverse patient population. Not everyone wants a phone call just like not everyone wants a text message. Giving your patients the option to “opt in” to certain preferences upfront at the registration desk should be cost-of-entry for reducing friction.
Patients are far more likely to engage with financing options when they understand their financial responsibility from the beginning. One Chief Financial Officer of a major non-profit, independent regional health system said it best: “The fastest-growing payer isn’t Blue Cross. It’s not United. It’s not Aetna or Cigna. It’s the patient.”
Principle #3: Accountability—It’s Not All on the Patients
The beauty and curse of a patient financing program lies in the sheer fact that the success doesn’t fall completely on one party. There are three stakeholder groups involved in making sure the wheels of the program are staying on the tracks and everyone is accomplishing their respective duties.
These are as follows:
- Providers: Offer clear communication from day one. Present multiple modes of payment for patients to utilize, and determine upfront what communication preferences are best.
- Payers: Adjudicate in a timely manner and ensure benefits information is up-to-date.
- Patients: Engage with financial options and choose the one that works best. Speak up when challenges arise or terms are unclear.
Each of these groups plays a unique role in closing the gap in unpaid claims and raising the bar for what is possible when it’s all hands on deck. Bottom line? Effective financing programs succeed when every stakeholder participates in a system designed for clarity and follow-through.
Closing
Financing programs are often viewed as a financial product. In reality, they are the outcome of a well-coordinated financial experience—one that requires the right strategy, the right partners, and the right timing.
At Revenue Enterprises, we’ve seen firsthand that successful patient financing programs don’t start with an application—they start with precision. Through our strategic partnerships with healthcare financing organizations, we align programs to the same three principles that drive success: coordination, transparency, and accountability. But what makes these programs truly effective is how and when they’re introduced.
Not every patient should be treated the same when it comes to financial resolution—and that’s where our approach stands apart. By leveraging advanced segmentation strategies and propensity-to-pay technology, we help providers identify the right accounts for the right solutions. This ensures that financing options are offered thoughtfully, to patients who are most likely to benefit from them, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach that can create confusion or unnecessary burden.
We also recognize that for many patients, the idea of financing or credit, especially during or after a health event, can feel overwhelming. That’s why our highly trained customer service representatives serve as more than support agents; they act as concierge financial liaisons. They meet patients with empathy, guide them through available options, and help them choose the path that best fits their individual circumstances and their family’s needs.
This human-centered approach transforms financing from a transactional process into a trusted experience.
The impact is measurable. Providers see stronger recovery performance by aligning solutions to patient behavior and capability. Patients feel more confident and supported, reducing confusion and disengagement. And perhaps most importantly, healthcare organizations strengthen their brand reputation—creating an experience that patients remember not just for the care they received, but for how they were treated financially afterward.
Because when patients trust the financial side of their healthcare experience, they’re far more likely to return when they need care again. Financing, when done right, isn’t about debt—it’s about access, trust, and long-term relationships.
